Petition to the United Nations ICCPR Body.

“ATTENTION DEAR FREELANCERS” PLEASE NOTE AND BIDS SUBMITTED WITHOUT SUBMITTENG THE OUTLINE OF YOUR UNDER STANDING OF THE PROJECTED WILL BE DISCARDED. THE PROJECT WILL BE AWARDED TO THE FREELANCERS ON THE BASES OF HIS/HER OUTLINE OF THE CASE AND THE KNOWLEDGE OF HUMAN RIGHTS LAWS. IF YOU ARE QUALIFIED LAWYER AND HAVE THE NECESSARY EXPERIENCE AND UNDERSTAND THE PROJECT WELL THAN KINDLY SUBMIT YOUR BID BY JANUARY 10, 2023 WITH A ONE OR TWO PAGE OF (OUTLINE OF THE ISSUES AS YOU UNDERSTAND IT) SYNOPSIS. PLEASE NOTE ALL BIDS WILL BE REVIEWED ON JANUARY 10, 2023 AND PROJECT WILL BE AWARDED THEREAFTER. THIS WILL GIVE THE FREELANCER ENOUGH TIME TO EXAMINE THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS AND PREPARE THE PETITION IN COMPLIANCE WITH "ICCPR" RULES. Please look at the attached documents, which can't be argued with, which prove what they say, and explain what they mean. They show that Canada's highest court committed one of the most serious illegal act. "The top court of Canada," by ignoring its constitutional duties to uphold the constitution and uphold the rule of law and respect international covenants and violated ICCPR articles 14(1), 14(5), and others, which the lawyer will have to list in the petition. The Supreme Court of Canada by its implied admission have admitted the fraud and also it has acted in a dishonest way and have lost the jurisdiction in this case. It has lost the right to hear this case and has left Hirjis without a lawful remedy. The ICCPR covenants are being utilized by Hirjis in this case. Canada in 1976 gave the Human Rights Committee the power to look into individual complaints by ratifying or joining an Optional Protocol (for the ICCPR, CEDAW, CRPD, ICESCR, and CRC) or by making a statement under a specific article of the Convention (in the case of CERD, CAT, CED) The Supreme court of Canada is regarded as impartial arbitrator and the custodian of the state's constitution and the rule of law, both of which have been compromised and weakened by the Supreme Court of Canada as a result of its abuse of power and illegal refusal to uphold the rule of law to protect the criminal acts committed by the trial judge. This case demonstrates the following: The indisputable evidence in the court records demonstrates that the law of the State can be in place, the legislation can be in place, the international treaties ratified by the state member can be in place, but when the judicial officers of the highest court of the land who are appointed by the state as custodian of the state's constitution and the rule of law to protect the citizens liberty and freedom and it intentionally and openly refuses to uphold the litigants fundamental rights and rule of law and the treaties ratified by the state and willfully decline to uphold the constitution by placing themselves above the rule of the law to protect the illegal acts of lower court judges and became the willful violators of the Constitution instead of protectors of the Constitution as demonstrated by indisputable evidence in this case then there cannot be any doubt that a serious break down in the judicial system of the state has occurred. Under these conditions the expectations of due process of law or a fair and impartial trial, or justice, or relief from the Canadian courts is most unlikely. [login to view URL] (request to registrar) [login to view URL] (void orders of SCC) [login to view URL] (case laws Void Court Order) [login to view URL] (MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION)